Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.

By Fikret Berkes. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009

2,417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33a065c6734f5f5de55add2511eb6193840a2abd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Leverage points for sustainability transformation (2017, background): “Re-think: How knowledge is produced and used The way knowledge is created, shared and used in society crucially influences transformation processes (Berkes 2009), and has the potential to influence system parameters, feedbacks, design and intent.”
Co-management and Indigenous protected areas in Australia: achievements and ways forward (2009, background): “Australia’s approaches, like those overseas (Berkes 2009), evolved against a backdrop of international and national change with respect to recognition of Indigenous people’s rights, control of their land and resources, chang ing Ind igenous peop le ’ s a sp i ra t ions , and development of practical”
Indigenous knowledge on climate change adaptation: a global evidence map of academic literature (2020, background): “The value of diversity for decision-making has been long recognised in the literature on resource management (Berkes 2009, Norström et al 2020, van Bavel et al 2020).”
Social Learning and Natural Resource Management: The Emergence of Three Research Perspectives (2011, methodology): “This position on natural systems highlights the importance of creating adequate opportunities for flexible, open, and participatory resource management, and it identifies learning-based approaches as a suitable alternative to models used in the past (Armitage 2005, Berkes 2009).”
Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning (2017, background): “Adaptive management ideas have been applied to resource and environmental co-management, the idea of sharing management power and responsibility between the government and local resource users [48,55].”
Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review (2015, background): “Knowledge producers can become knowledge users, and knowledge users can become knowledge producers, thereby breaking traditional conceptions of linear ‘knowledge transfer’ processes (e.g. Phillipson and Liddon 2007; Berkes 2009; Phillipson et al. 2012).”
Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives (2020, background): “By analysing the key papers on bridging institutions in sustainable development (Berkes, 2009; Brown, 1991; Folke et al., 2005; Hahn et al., 2006), we identi ﬁ ed the ﬁ ve roles that must be undertaken by actors participating in social innovation initiatives if transformation is to occur.”
Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. (2010, methodology): “This view is reflected in the approaches of adaptive co-management (Folke et al., 2005; Armitage et al., 2007, 2008, 2009; Berkes, 2009), trans-disciplinary planning (Tress et al., 2006), community-based natural resource management (e.g., Kellert et al., 2000; Blaikie, 2006; Robinson, 2006a,b),…”
Towards Adaptive Management: Examining the Strategies of Policy Entrepreneurs in Dutch Water Management (2011, background): “In this regard, it is interesting to note that, in the literature on adaptive comanagement and resilience, the importance of building trust actually is recognized (Olsson et al. 2004, Lebel et al. 2005, Hahn et al. 2006, Berkes 2009).”
Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function (2014, background): “A global movement of broadening participation in natural resources decisionmaking has evolved towards sharing power and responsibility (Berkes, 2009).”
Integrating rural development and biodiversity conservation in Central Romania (2013, background): “Bridging organizations provide valuable links between actors with various interests and worldviews (Olsson et al. 2007; Berkes 2009; Börzel & Buzogány 2010).”
Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation (2015, background): “Collaborative forms of governance are increasingly regarded as an essential mechanism for addressing environmental problems (Berkes 2009).”
Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research (2014, background): “To acknowledge these rights and avoid legal conflicts, recent policy agreements have shifted regional decision-making agency toward indigenous governments in both co-management and government-to-government processes (e.g., Wyatt 2008, Berkes 2009, Housty et al. 2014).”
Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation (2011, background): “2006), in many others new integrated management systems, like adaptive co-management and ecosystem-based management, are emerging and being institutionalized around the world (Garaway and Arthur 2004; Armitage et al. 2007; Olsson et al. 2008; Berkes 2009; Cundill and Fabricius 2010).”