The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?

By Ö. Bodin, B. Crona. 2009

1,478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3225b0824a15295ae8b4369cba23cedcb874189

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Emergent Network Structure of the Multilateral Environmental Agreement System (2013, background): “These topological properties reflect differences in the governing system structure that may lead to significant differences in governance processes and outcomes (Bodin and Crona, 2009; Orsini et al., 2013).”
Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs (2013, background): “, 2006) are rare but increasing because of a new emphasis on interdisciplinary approaches and the role of social research in conservation planning and natural resource management (Bodin and Crona, 2009; Knight et al., 2010).”
Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review (2016, background): “resources, since the geographic nature and scale of many environmental issues tend to require management across legal and administrative boundaries (Bodin and Crona 2009).”
Conservation stakeholder network mapping, analysis, and weaving (2011, background): “Bridging actors play an important role in facilitating the exchange of diverse ideas and skills (Prell et al. 2009), and likely contribute to greater capacity for innovative problem-solving (Bodin & Crona 2009) in the Lincoln County network.”
Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games (2014, background): “One important problem with the SES network governance literature is that there is not a consensus on what types of network structures are more effective for different types of social-ecological contexts (Bodin and Crona 2009).”
Adaptive Comanagement: a Systematic Review and Analysis (2012, methodology): “Studies employing more formal methods of definition and analysis make use of more clearly defined operational measures (e.g., density, cohesion, centralization) (see Bodin and Norberg 2005, Bodin and Crona 2009).”
Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. (2012, background): “…techniques developed in fields such as sociology, organizational science, and public administration (Provan and Kenis 2008, Scholz et al. 2008, Bodin and Crona 2009, Pahl-Wostl and Kranz 2010) to examine how social network structure affects network performance and activity (Sandström and…”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience Through Multi-scalar Collaboration Surmountable Chasms: Networks and Social Innovation for Resilient Systems (2011, background): “Ultimately, the relationship between the phases of innovation and the network structures and ties still needs further study (Newman and Dale 2005, Gilsing and Duysters 2008, Bodin and Crona 2009).”
Network analysis in conservation biogeography: challenges and opportunities (2010, background): “…has now been introduced to the interdisciplinary arena as a viable route to explore problems in natural resource management (Bodin et al., 2006a; Bodin & Crona, 2009), including such issues as the generation of social norms and communities of knowledge (through ‘strong ties’), the transfer of…”
Structural and Institutional Determinants of Influence Reputation: A Comparison of Collaborative and Adversarial Policy Networks in Decision Making and Implementation (2014, background): “In some applications—mainly concerning natural resource management—the boundaries between the two are blurred by analyzing decision making in local policy networks as a common good (Henry, Lubell and McCoy 2011; Ingold 2011; Bodin and Crona 2009; Scholz and Wang 2006; Lubell and Scholz 2001).”
The Impact of Information Provision on Agglomeration Bonus Performance: An Experimental Study on Local Networks (2014, positive): “This network representation simultaneously introduces a spatial component into the strategic setting and captures the features of farming communities in which social networks play an important role in sustainable resource management (Bodin and Crona 2009).”
Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems (2017, background): “This entails directing attention to who the actors are, with whom they collaborate, and how the structures of such “collaborative networks” relate to the actors’ abilities to address different environmental problems (38, 39).”
Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation (2011, background): “The more successful adaptive governance systems, often emergent and self-organizing, connect individuals, networks, organizations, agencies, and institutions at multiple organizational levels with ecosystem dynamics (Folke et al. 2005; Bodin and Crona 2009; Berkes 2010).”
Reconnecting to the Biosphere (2011, background): “The more successful adaptive governance systems, often emergent and self-organizing, connect individuals, networks, organizations, agencies, and institutions at multiple organizational levels with ecosystem dynamics (Folke et al. 2005; Olsson et al. 2008; Berkes 2009; Bodin and Crona 2009).”