The Langer-Improved Wald Test for DIF Testing With Multiple Groups

By Carol M. Woods, Li Cai, Mian Wang. 2013

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8254101c363bd9a9c705f0614530d7e17bb6d46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Louis Tay
2. Mengyang Cao
3. Adam W. Meade
4. Gordon W. Cheung
5. Rebecca S. Lau
6. Myeongsun Yoon
7. G. Moors
8. Miloš Kankaraš

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Adam W. Meade
2. Louis Tay
3. Mengyang Cao
4. Marc H. Bornstein
5. D. Putnick

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Louis Tay
2. Mengyang Cao
3. Adam W. Meade
4. Gordon W. Cheung
5. Marc H. Bornstein
6. D. Putnick
7. Rebecca S. Lau
8. Myeongsun Yoon

Citations in the corpus

• An Overview and Practical Guide to IRT Measurement Equivalence Analysis (2015, methodology): “From experience and past research, the Wald w(2) has well-controlled Type I errors when anchor items are specified (Woods et al., 2012).”