Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework

By Christos N. Pitelis. 2012

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e81d909d7e539f5c6bf17f50ffd39d20376bdc8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Rolf Sternberg
2. N. Bosma
3. B. Spigel
4. Zhe Cao
5. Xianwei Shi
6. Annika Tidström
7. Paavo Ritala
8. P. Tomlinson

In Strategy and Management

1. B. Spigel
2. Annika Tidström
3. Paavo Ritala
4. P. Tomlinson
5. David Bailey
6. Zhe Cao
7. Xianwei Shi
8. N. Bosma

Citations in the corpus

• A place-based developmental regional industrial strategy for sustainable capture of co-created value (2018, background): “…relational embeddedness of firms (and other actors) within (regional) networks that is crucial for creating and diffusing new knowledge and facilitating innovation (Maskell and Malmberg, 1999; Capello and Faggian, 2005) 5 , and co-creating value with an eye to capturing part of it (Pitelis, 2012).”
• The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (2017, background): “Entrepreneurial ecosystems are similarly marked by this type of relational governance and lack a clear power hierarchy or formalized enforcement methods that could impede informal interaction between firms (Bell, Tracey, & Heide, 2009; Pitelis, 2012).”
• Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: a principal investigator-centered governance framework (2019, background): “…(Spigel 2015), environmental factors (Suresh and Ramraj 2012), evolutionary trajectories (Mack and Mayer 2016), global innovation networks (Malecki 2011), high growth firms (Mason and Brown 2014), environmental sustainability (Cohen 2006), clusters, co-creation, and appropriability (Pitelis 2012).”
• Towards a theory of ecosystems (2018, unknown): “…as the unit of interest of the analysis; and focus on new venture creation and related entrepreneurial issues, including knowledge/innovation spillovers, growth, access to resources, and markets (e.g., McGregor & Madsen, 2013; Pitelis, 2012; Zahra & Nambisan, 2012; Zacharakis et al ., 2003).”
• A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies (2020, background): “Instead of providing all services by one stakeholder, providing complementary but dissimilar services can reduce transaction costs (Pitelis 2012) and help identify each other’s area of expertise, which in turn facilitates alignment for ecosystem sustainability.”
• The openness of open innovation in ecosystems – Integrating innovation and management literature on knowledge linkages (2018, background): “The number of players as well as contextualised or shared knowledge on the network or ecosystem level (Almirall, Lee, & Majchrzak, 2014; Pitelis, 2012; Traitler et al., 2011) provides more openness than the dyadic transfer without any knowledge exchange with others.”
• Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway (2021, background): “Additionally, an entrepreneurial ecosystem can mutate from a pre-existing system such as an industry cluster (Autio et al., 2018; Pitelis, 2012), or set of co-located clusters of varying vintages, through technological convergence in related and unrelated branches (Auerswald & Dani, 2017).”
• Entrepreneurship as an Urban Event? Empirical Evidence from European Cities (2014, background): “…opportunities of entrepreneurship policies dedicated to (large) urban areas and the location-specific needs of such policies, for example through the establishment of location-based growth accelerators (BOSMA and STAM, 2012) and adopting frameworks of entrepreneurial ecosystems (PITELIS, 2012).”
• Developing and governing entrepreneurial ecosystems: the structure of entrepreneurial support programs in Edinburgh, Scotland (2016, background): “Pitelis (2012) suggests that the issue of appropriability is a barrier to cultivating entrepreneur-led ecosystems.”
• Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: A longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels (2014, background): “…have been calls for further research on integrating value appropriation into the analysis of value creation, both on the alliance level (for a discussion, see e.g., Lavie, 2007; Adegbesan & Higgins, 2010) and the network level (for a discussion, see e.g., Pitelis, 2012; Fjelstad et al., 2012).”