Influence of a fine glass powder on the durability characteristics of concrete and its comparison to fly ash

400 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Properties of architectural mortar prepared with recycled glass with different particle sizes (2011, background): “The implementation has gained wide acceptance due to the innocuous behaviour of ASR in concrete [13].”
Comparison of ground waste glass with other supplementary cementitious materials (2014, neutral): “indirectly evaluated by sorptivity [31,32] or electrical resistivity [30,32] measurements), and delay in the penetration”
Waste glass powder as cement replacement in concrete (2014, background): “…to characterize the pozzolanic activity of finely ground GP in concrete (Shao et al. 2000; Dyer and Dhir 2001; Shi et al. 2005; Neithalath 2008; Schwarz et al. 2008; Jain and Neithalath 2010; Matos and Sousa-Coutinho 2012; Khmiri et al. 2013; Carsana et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2014;…”
Chloride transport in fly ash and glass powder modified concretes - Influence of test methods on microstructure (2010, methodology): “Hydration and strength development in glass powder modified cement pastes [4,5], and mechanical and durability properties of concrete containing glass powder [6–8] have been reported in earlier studies.”
Durability of mortar using waste glass powder as cement replacement (2012, background): “Results obtained in the present study, confirm values by other authors [16,19,20], where performance of glass powder mortar is better than control mortar regarding chloride penetration.”