Chloride transport in fly ash and glass powder modified concretes - Influence of test methods on microstructure

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Waste glass powder as cement replacement in concrete (2014, background): “…pozzolanic activity of finely ground GP in concrete (Shao et al. 2000; Dyer and Dhir 2001; Shi et al. 2005; Neithalath 2008; Schwarz et al. 2008; Jain and Neithalath 2010; Matos and Sousa-Coutinho 2012; Khmiri et al. 2013; Carsana et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2014; Mirzahosseiniand and Riding 2014;…”
Comparison of ground waste glass with other supplementary cementitious materials (2014, unknown): “indirectly evaluated by sorptivity [31,32] or electrical resistivity [30,32] measurements), and delay in the penetration”
Microstructure, strength, and moisture stability of alkali activated glass powder-based binders (2014, result): “Fine glass powder has been reported to have adequate pozzolanic properties [19,20] and concretes made with partial replacement of cement by glass powder has shown comparable performance to that of fly ash modified concretes [21,22].”
Durability of mortar using waste glass powder as cement replacement (2012, result): “Results obtained in the present study, confirm values by other authors [16,19,20], where performance of glass powder mortar is better than control mortar regarding chloride penetration.”