Comparison of ground waste glass with other supplementary cementitious materials
By M. Carsana, Massimiliano Frassoni, Luca Bertolini. 2014
177 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering, Earth-Surface Processes
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ed468fc5f74d2a63b7606b7792f657a041d1dcc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Earth-Surface Processes
Citations in the corpus
- On the use of crystalline admixtures in cement based construction materials: from porosity reducers to promoters of self healing (2016, background): “Moreover, traditional mineral additions for cement replacement, such as fly ash or blast furnace slag [34, 35], or innovative pozzolanic additions [36, 37], investigated by different researchers, may also promote autogeneous healing because of delayed hydration, since high amounts of these binders r”
- Waste glass powder as cement replacement in concrete (2014, background): “Some studies have been conducted to characterize the pozzolanic activity of finely ground GP in concrete (Shao et al. 2000; Dyer and Dhir 2001; Shi et al. 2005; Neithalath 2008; Schwarz et al. 2008; Jain and Neithalath 2010; Matos and Sousa-Coutinho 2012; Khmiri et al. 2013; Carsana et al. 2014; Kim”
- Waste glass in the production of cement and concrete – A review (2014, methodology): “Different materials have been used to mitigate the ASR like metakaolin [63], fly ash [58,64] and silica fume [1].”