Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson

By Johannes Lenhard. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2006

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Final Collapse of the Neyman-Pearson Decision Theoretic Framework and Rise of the neoFisherian (2009, background): “Lenhard (2006) gives an excellent analysis of the " profound conceptual basis " for the distractingly polemical battles between Fisher and Neyman and Pearson, which was that " both sides held conflicting views about the function of mathematical models and about the role of modelling in statistical…”
Integrative Data Analysis: The Simultaneous Analysis of Multiple Data Sets (2009, background): “5For more detailed discussions about the similarities and differences between model-based and design-based procedures as well as current hybrid designs that combine the two approaches see Guo & Hussy (2004), Little (2004), Lenhard (2006), Muthén and Satorra (1995) and Sterba (2009).”
Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering (2014, background): “We will here define a theory to be scientific if it has been submitted to, and survived, two kinds of tests [7, 36]:”