Taxonomic sufficiency: The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates
By F. Jones. 2008
283 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0143f244fcc5dbe8aacf550c51f326e416cd3e05
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Florian Leese
- Vasco Elbrecht
- Frédéric Rimet
- Agnès Bouchez
- F. Boero
- A. Terlizzi
- J. Hendricks
- Daniel Forsin Buss
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Frédéric Rimet
- F. Boero
- Florian Leese
- J. Hendricks
- Agnès Bouchez
- Daniel Forsin Buss
- Vasco Elbrecht
- Laura L. Timms
Citations in the corpus
- Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol (2015, methodology): “For macroinvertebrates, this is best achieved by determining diagnostic characters (usually in male adult specimens [13,20,21]), sequencing the specimens, and depositing the COI sequences in a database such as the BOLD database [22].”
- The Generification of the Fossil Record (2014, background): “…referred to as ‘‘taxonomic sufficiency’’ or ‘‘taxonomic surrogacy’’—is used especially in the field of biomonitoring (using local biota to characterize and monitor environmental conditions) (e.g., Wu 1982; Ellis 1985; Heino and Soininen 2007; Jones 2008; Musco et al. 2009; Bevilacqua et al. 2012).”
- Rapid Bioassessment Protocols using benthic macroinvertebrates in Brazil: evaluation of taxonomic sufficiency (2010, background): “Bioassessments require only suffi- cient information to distinguish sites impaired by human activities from those in their natural or nearnatural state (Jones 2008).”
- Does species‐level resolution matter? Taxonomic sufficiency in terrestrial arthropod biodiversity studies (2013, methodology): “Taxonomic sufficiency has been commonly applied to bioassessment studies, especially in aquatic systems (reviews by, Bowman & Bailey, 1997; Terlizzi et al., 2003; Bates et al., 2007; Jones, 2008).”
- Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers (2012, background): “Similarly some authors showed for macroinvertebrates that there was no clear increase of the assessment power when taxonomic resolution increased (Jones, 2008).”
- Females do count: Documenting Chironomidae (Diptera) species diversity using DNA barcoding (2010, background): “It is now well accepted that species-level identifications should be the default in freshwater bioassessments, in order to maximise the information content available for statistical analyses and to ensure comprehensive summaries of biotic compositions (Jones 2008 and references therein).”
- Taxonomic relatedness does not matter for species surrogacy in the assessment of community responses to environmental drivers (2012, background): “This would allow the retention of greater ecological information than when using a single higher taxonomic rank (Lenat &Resh 2001; Jones 2008; Groc et al. 2010).”