Ruth S. DeFries

Global and Planetary Change · 2000–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 28 papers; trusts 18 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Ruth S. DeFries trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Elizabeth A. Stuart
  2. J. Ervin
  3. J. Berger
  4. Ruerd Ruben
  5. Julian P. T. Higgins
  6. Chris Bacon
  7. Stuart Pimm
  8. Eric F. Lambin
  9. R. Fort
  10. Frédéric Achard

Who trusts Ruth S. DeFries overall

  1. Harini Nagendra
  2. Holly K. Gibbs
  3. Patrick Meyfroidt
  4. Eric F. Lambin
  5. Matthew C. Hansen
  6. J. Bray
  7. Frédéric Achard
  8. Eberhard Hansis
  9. Lydia P. Olander
  10. Martin Herold

Papers from Ruth S. DeFries's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Ruth S. DeFries trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions
  2. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality
  3. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth
  4. Effects of Fair Trade and organic certifications on small-scale coffee farmer households in Central America and Mexico (Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems)
  5. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  6. Faculty Opinions recommendation of Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.
  7. Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?
  8. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005 (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  9. A Multicriteria Assessment of the Irreplaceability and Vulnerability of Sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
  10. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity?

Their papers