A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management

By Stefan Hajkowicz, Andrew J. Higgins. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008

414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method (2013, neutral): “For a survey and comparison of different MCDM methods see [32], [33] and [34], although the COPRAS method is not discussed.”
Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Strategic Planning Tool for Water Loss Management (2011, methodology): “According to Hajkowicz and Higgins (2008), the main challenge is not in developing more sophisticated MCDA methodologies but to develop more systematic frameworks to support the initial structuring of the decision problem in terms of selecting criteria and decision options.”
Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection (2018, methodology): “[130] Benchmark comparison A solution of three problems using 5 MCDA methods by experts.”
Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability (2016, background): “making situation; there is not always an overwhelming reason to adopt one technique over another [71].”
Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods (2020, methodology): “In the work of Hajkowicz and Higgins [30] rankings were compared using five methods (Simple Additive Weighting, Range of Value Method, PROMETHEE II, Evamix, and Compromise programming).”