Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comparing Social Value Creation

By Arne Kroeger, Christian Weber. 2014

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6bc1ca6b0ba94aec0ac9b7298e96e80a2050d4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Stefan Schaltegger
2. Robert S. Nason
3. Sophie Bacq

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Matthew Johnson
2. Stefan Schaltegger
3. Robert S. Nason
4. Sophie Bacq
5. David Gras

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Matthew Johnson
2. Stefan Schaltegger
3. Robert S. Nason
4. Sophie Bacq
5. David Gras

Citations in the corpus

• Deconstructing the Way in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship (2018, neutral): “Kroeger and Weber (2014) quantify and compare social value creation and assess the effectiveness of interventions, regardless of the sector in which they occur.”
• Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Review and Multilevel Causal Mechanism Framework (2019, background): “…to social value creation, considering remediation of social services no longer provided by state institutions, but also achieving ‘shared value creation’ with positive outcomes for both entrepreneurial venture and local communities (Kroeger & Weber, 2014; Rahdari et al., 2016; Seelos & Mair, 2005).”
• Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises (2018, neutral): “…the absence of an agreed-on definition and dimensionalization of the SE construct explains the widely differing operationalization in the empirical SE literature (as criticized by Dwivedi & Weerawardena, 2018; Kroeger & Weber, 2014; Lepoutre, Justo, Terjesen, & Bosma, 2013; Stevens et al., 2015).”
• Understanding the Social Role of Entrepreneurship (2016, neutral): “As such, they are distinct from not-for-profit social entrepreneurs (Kroeger and Weber, 2014).”
• A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations (2017, background): “…of carbon emissions, more transparent reporting practices, improved union relations, fewer product recalls), widely applicable measures and evaluation mechanisms across social performance initiatives and industry boundaries remain elusive (Ballou, Heitger, & Landes, 2006; Kroeger & Weber, 2014).”