On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation

By Martin Wigbertus Antonius Caminada. European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 2006

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation (2009, background): “This approach was pioneered by Pollock [21] and Jakobovits and Vermeir [20], and has more recently been extended by Caminada [8] [11], Vreeswijk [28] and Verheij [26].”
An introduction to argumentation semantics (2011, background): “…in the basic formalization (Verheij for instance does not use the standard extension-based approach), it can be proved that Verheij’s approach is equivalent to that of Caminada, who, independently from Verheij, rediscovered the same concept under the name of semi-stable semantics (Caminada, 2006b).”
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments (2010, background): “First, dialectical interpretations are easily proved to be equivalent to stable labellings, which are known to be equivalent to stable semantics (first proved by Verheij (1996) ; see also Jakobovits and Vermeir ( 1999 ), and Caminada (2006) ).”
Semi-stable semantics (2006, background): “In order to understand the intuition behind semi-stable semantics, it can be useful to express it in terms of argument labellings [10] [16].”
On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics (2007, background): “the context of labellings of argumentation frameworks [10].”