Semi-stable semantics

429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial (2014, background): “Wu (2012) has studied how ASPIC+ can be modified to satisfy several additional rationality postulates proposed by Caminada et al. (2012). van Gijzel and Prakken (2012) have reconstructed the Carneades system of Gordon et al. (2007) in ASPIC+. Bex et al. (2013) have used ASPIC+ to give a logical…”
An introduction to argumentation semantics (2011, background): “…in the basic formalization (Verheij for instance does not use the standard extension-based approach), it can be proved that Verheij’s approach is equivalent to that of Caminada, who, independently from Verheij, rediscovered the same concept under the name of semi-stable semantics (Caminada, 2006b).”
A general account of argumentation with preferences (2013, background): “Thirdly, [19] recently proposed the additional so called ‘non-interference’ and ‘crash resistance’ rationality postulates, which are about whether self-defeating arguments can interfere with the justification status of other arguments in undesired ways.”
Abstract Dialectical Frameworks (2010, background): “Several alternative proposals exist like semi-stable (Caminada 2006) and ideal (Dung, Mancarella, and Toni 2007) semantics.”