On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics

By Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin. Artificial Intelligence, 2007

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation (2009, background): “Although quite extensive work has been done describing the properties of the various argument-based semantics [4, 3], what is lacking is a comprehensive way of expressing properties of argumentation using existing logical approaches.”
Argumentation in artificial intelligence (2007, background): “The article by Baroni and Giacomin [22], makes a powerful case for re-examining the proliferation of new semantics:”
An introduction to argumentation semantics (2011, background): “‘rooted’ in unattacked arguments (see Baroni and Giacomin (2007) for a formal treatment of this notion, called strong defense ).”
Semi-stable semantics (2006, background): “Since semi-stable semantics, just like any mainstream argumentation semantics, satisfies language independence [5], the fact that AF P and AF ctree T P are isomorphic means their extensions of arguments will correspond to each other.”