Achieving deep reductions in US transport greenhouse gas emissions: Scenario analysis and policy implications

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A comprehensive model of regional electric vehicle adoption and penetration (2017, background): “…et al., 2009), travel demand management (flexible hours, teleworking) (McCollum and Yang, 2009), shifting from personal car to public transport (McCollum and Yang, 2009; Stanley et al., 2011), alternative fuels (hydrogen, electricity, biofuel) (Bubeck et al., 2016; Leighty et al., 2012),…”
Evolving Narratives of Low-Carbon Futures in Transportation (2016, background): “California and US-specific studies relied on a model framework with high transport-technology resolution to identify both supply- and demand-side measures to achieve up to 80% in GHG emissions by 2050 (McCollum & Yang, 2009; Yang, McCollum, McCarthy, & Leighty, 2009) (Figure 2).”
Science and the Stock Market: Investors’ Recognition of Unburnable Carbon (2014, background): “Under such rational response hypothesis, we predict a negative price reaction as early as April 29, 2009, when the BBC first published its story about Allen et al. (2009) and Meinshausen et al.”
The impact of telecommuting on personal vehicle usage and environmental sustainability (2014, background): “Other sources of transportation emissions are anticipated to account for more than 50 % of the transportation in emission in the USA by 2050 with aviation contributing a large part to that growth (McCollum and Yang 2009, p. 5594; IEA 2008).”