Explaining the development of dietary dominance by a single ungulate taxon at Grotte XVI

By D. Grayson, F. Delpech, J. Rigaud, J. Simek. 2001

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Atmospheric Science, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5d5cad934e4eeb924cea7aebf67458efc08bc65

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. K. Lupo
2. D. Meltzer
3. Christopher T. Morgan
4. P. Koch
5. M. Cannon
6. E. Jones
7. A. Barnosky
8. A. Stuart

In Atmospheric Science

1. A. Barnosky
2. P. Koch
3. Christopher T. Morgan
4. E. Jones
5. D. Meltzer
6. K. Lupo
7. M. Cannon

In Paleontology

1. D. Meltzer
2. K. Lupo
3. Christopher T. Morgan
4. A. Barnosky
5. M. Cannon
6. P. Koch
7. E. Jones
8. D. Bowman

Citations in the corpus

• Early Paleoindian foraging: examining the faunal evidence for large mammal specialization and regional variability in prey choice (2004, background): “…diets than generalists, and the degree to which assemblages are dominated by the bones of large mammals, a characteristic that can be measured in several ways (e.g., Broughton, 1994; Mellars, 1996; Grayson and Delpech, 1998, 2002; Grayson et al., 2001; Waguespack and Surovell, 2003; Jones, 2004).”
• Late Quaternary Extinctions: State of the Debate (2006, background): “…approach will be a series of wholistic, species-by-species analyses that consider animal behavior and life history, environmental pressures, the impact of human predation—as well as indirect human impacts—and a realistic evaluation of taphonomic processes (Fisher 1987, Grayson et al. 2001).”
• The Archaeological Record of Human Impacts on Animal Populations (2001, unknown): “Indeed, virtually wherever archaeologists have sought such effects, they have found them-among, for instance, pinnipeds along the west coast of North America (Hildbrandt and Jones, 1992; Jones and Hildebrandt, 1995; see also Lyman, 1995); mammals and fish along the lower Columbia River of Oregon dur”
• Is it Intensification Yet? Current Archaeological Perspectives on the Evolution of Hunter-Gatherer Economies (2015, background): “The latter is straightforward and simple to measure via changes in diet breadth: the restriction of diet to one or two preferred prey species, as was apparently the case with ibex and reindeer hunting during western Europe’s Early UP (Grayson and Delpech 2002; Grayson et al. 2001).”
• The uncertain blitzkrieg of Pleistocene megafauna (2004, background): “Geochronological control of climate change is also critical, as such events are the driving force behind palaeoecological changes and isotopic variations (Grayson et al., 2001).”
• Evolutionary Foraging Models in Zooarchaeological Analysis: Recent Applications and Future Challenges (2007, background): “…history, sample size, excavation techniques, analyst methodology, and space and time compression, can significantly and selectively impact faunal abundances and the resulting interpretation (e.g., Cannon 1999, 2001; Cruz-Uribe 1988; Grayson 1984; Grayson et al. 2001; Schmitt and Lupo 1995, 2005).”
• Dietary evenness, prey choice, and human–environment interactions (2004, methodology): “Given the increasing popularity of optimal foraging theory-based studies of archaeological subsistence [42], and the sometimes dramatic results achieved by authors already making use of evenness [19,21,36], an examination of what evenness actually measures is essential.”