Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model

By Robin P. Horton, Tamsin Buck, Patrick E. Waterson, C. Clegg. Journal of Information and Technology, 2001

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review (2010, background): “Similarly, if one study included several tests of the TAM at different points in time then the results for all of the tests were extracted but treated as non-independent tests within a single study [10,11,21,23,28,48,52,53].”
Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology acceptance model (2009, background): “The relationship between Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness and their effects on a user’s behavior have been examined and supported extensively in the IT/IS literature (e.g., Al-Gahtani and King 1999; Horton et al. 2001; Venkatesh and Davis 1996).”
Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology (2005, background): “…the 21st century, a number of researchers started to test the TAM model for adoption of the more complex information systems including intranet (Horton et al., 2001), desktop video conferencing in virtual workgroups (Townsend et al., 2001), academic use of Internet (Seyal et al., 2002),…”
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013 (2014, background): “Usage measures: usage measures for operationalization of actual system usage like attitude toward technology [23], usage perception [37, 61, 77], and actual usage of technology [26].”