The good, the bad and the blameworthy: Understanding the role of evaluative reasoning in folk psychology

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Epistemic Side-Effect Effect (2010, background): “Subjects also exhibit the side-effect effect when aesthetic or prudential (as opposed to moral) badness is at issue (Knobe, 2004a; Knobe and Mendlow, 2004).”
The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology (2006, background): “Now consider the status of the behavior decreasing sales in New Jersey.”
Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect. (2010, background): “The side-effect effect has been replicated with different methodologies (Knobe, 2003a, 2004; Knobe & Mendlow, 2004; Machery, 2008), across cultures (Knobe & Burra, 2006), and with preschool children (Leslie, Knobe, & Cohen, 2006).”
The Folk Concept of Intentional Action: Philosophical and Experimental Issues (2008, background): “Since Knobe and Mendlow (2004) fi rst found that a non-moral case and the harm case could elicit the same kind of judgment about the intentionality of side-effects, evidence has accumulated that the asymmetry between the judgments about the intentionality of side-effects is not found exclusively in…”
At the Heart of Morality Lies Folk Psychology (2009, background): “…Knobe (2006) has weakened his original claim—arguing that not only moral but also nonmoral evaluations can relax intentionality assessments (Knobe & Mendlow 2004); that there is indeed an intentionality concept both in folk psychology and in moral analysis but that evaluative…”