Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx

By P. Ferreras. 2001

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e55c0618c1172ce203ae5dabf92e43d3f62adfc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY (2005, background): “The flow of dispersing individuals may accordingly be polarized along certain axes and in certain directions within a given landscape (Gustafson and Gardner 1996, Ferreras 2001, Ovaskainen 2004).”
Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths - The example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania (2005, background): “Habitat connectivity is assumed to strongly influence species occurrence and population survival in fragmented landscapes (Fahrig and Merriam, 1985; Hanski, 1994; van Langefelde, 2000; Ferreras, 2001; D Eon et al., 2002).”
Lynx reintroductions in fragmented landscapes of Germany : Projects with a future or misunderstood wildlife conservation? (2005, background): “In protected areas, mortality rates for residents average about 0.1 (Ferreras et al., 1992; Jedrzejewski et al., 1996; Zimmermann, 1998; Ferreras, 2001; Breitenmoser-Würsten et al., 2001).”
Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? (2003, methodology): “Thanks to the new possibilities offered by GISsystems, landscape complexity can be included in the isolation measure when modelling dispersal Schippers et al. 1996; Tischendorf 1997; Halpin and Bunn 2000; Ferreras 2001; Graham 2001; Chardon et al. 2003.”
Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. (2011, background): “We hypothesize that this intermediate scale of connectivity will be important for maintaining metapopulations (Ferreras 2001) and increasing foraging success in landscapes with patchy resource distributions (Wiens 1989).”
The influences of patch shape and boundary contrast on insect response to fragmentation in California grasslands (2002, background): “This underscores the importance of defining landscape structural features, such as connectivity, based on how organisms perceive and use the landscape (e.g., Ferreras (2001)).”
Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) (2003, methodology): “This costdistance can also be interpreted as an effective distance Tischendorf and Fahrig 2000; Ferreras 2001; Ricketts 2001.”
Estimating effective landscape distances and movement corridors: Comparison of habitat and genetic data (2015, background): “To address these limitations, some authors have suggested that habitat suitability models predicting species occurrence on the basis of empirical data may provide a better estimation of resistance (Ferreras 2001, Chetkiewicz et al. 2006, O’Brien et al. 2006, Beier et al. 2008).”
Construction and optimization of an ecological network based on morphological spatial pattern analysis and circuit theory (2020, background): “However, there is currently no recognized standard (Walker and Craighead 1997; Ferreras 2001).”
Do corridors promote dispersal in grassland butterflies and other insects? (2007, background): “(Hanski 1999). This may be true for some species and in some landscapes (Moilanen and Hanski 1998), but other studies have demonstrated that physical barriers and the structure and permeability of the surrounding ‘‘matrix’’ in the landscape may have significant effects on dispersal of some species (”
MATRIX STRUCTURE OBSCURES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERPATCH MOVEMENT AND PATCH SIZE AND ISOLATION (2005, background): “Unfortunately, there is no ‘‘easy fix’’ because accounting for the effects of matrix structure on interpatch movement adds considerable complexity to a model (e.g., Ferreras 2001, Goodwin and Fahrig 2002b, James et al. 2002, Sutcliffe et al. 2003, Gardner and Gustafson 2004).”
Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review (2012, methodology): “…logistic regression analysis (Pullinger and Johnson 2010), maximum entropy and ecological niche factor analysis (Wang et al. 2008; Kuemmerele et al. 2011), and a variety of other less conventional approaches (e.g., Ferreras 2001; Flamm et al. 2005; Kindall and VanManen 2007; Kuroe et al. 2011).”
The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model (2003, methodology): “For instance, resistance values were calculated as inversely related to habitat preference in the Iberian lynx (Ferreras, 2001), or flows of individuals in zooplankton and butterflies (Michels et al.”
Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages (2008, background): “The volume of movement in some corridors is predominantly unidirectional due to funneling effect of the landscape configuration (Ferreras 2001) or asymmetric population sizes (Dixon et al. 2006).”