Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures.

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology (2012, methodology): “In such functional spatial graphs, links are weighted according tomatrix quality (least-cost or resistance links; Rayfield et al., 2011) and can also have directionality (Treml et al., 2008; Dale and Fortin, 2010).”
Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “The importance of stepping-stones and other 614 patches can be prioritized using different indices (e.g. Rayfield et al. 2011), which quantify 615 the importance of the focal habitat to maintaining connectivity between the patches (e.g. 616 Pereira et al. 2011).”
Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States (2012, background): “…graphtheoretical approaches have been developed (Urban and Keitt 2001; McRae 2006; Urban et al. 2009; Dale & Fortin 2010; Saura et al. 2011; Rayfield et al. 2011; Theobald et al. in press), which can identify areas important for movement throughout a network of patches in a landscape,…”