Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.)

By J. Chardon, F. Adriaensen, E. Matthysen. Landscape Ecology, 2003

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/313dea43a27ffaa52445f816c4a3507d9cb57a07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Targeting and evaluating biodiversity conservation action within fragmented landscapes: an approach based on generic focal species and least-cost networks (2010, methodology): “The permeability score of each matrix land cover type was used to define the effective or least-cost distance a species can potentially move through the matrix (Adriaensen et al. 2003; Chardon et al. 2003; Sutcliffe et al. 2003).”
Quantifying functional connectivity: Experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) (2004, background): “As pointed out by recent studies e.g., Chardon et al. 2003 , resistance should be expressed in terms of relative rather than absolute values since the cost-distance is a relative measure.”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “How distance between two patches should be measured is important: should it be simple Euclidean distance (i.e. shortest distance) or should it take account of landscape heterogeneity and other resources which may affect speed of dispersal (e.g. Chardon et al. 2003)?”
Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? (2003, methodology): “Craighead 1997; Bunn et al. 2000; Ferreras 2001; Graham 2001; Michels et al. 2001; Chardon et al. 2003 .”
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation (2005, background): “Both Ferreras (2001) and Chardon et al. (2003) found effective isolation was a more accurate predictor of connectivity than Euclidean distance.”
Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana) (2006, unknown): “The total sum of costs along the least-cost path (generally referred to as ‘least-cost distance’) could potentially constitute such a measure (Chardon et al. 2003).”
Biological corridors and connectivity (2013, methodology): “example, Clevenger et al. (2002) developed two habitat models for black bears, one based on expert opinion and the other based on data from the literature.”
Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review (2012, methodology): “This approach was combined with detection data (Chardon et al. 2003), relocation data (Desrochers et al.”
Effect of landscape composition and arrangement on biological control agents in a simplified agricultural system: A cost–distance approach (2010, methodology): “To determine the level of favorability among the different land uses, we followed a method similar to that of Chardon et al. (2003), Verbeylen et al.”
Ecology of butterflies in Europe (2009, background): “, 2005), and iv) The landscape context by calculating the amount of habitat within buffers of different radii characterising different spatial scales of habitat perception (Chardon et al., 2003; Bergman et al., 2004; Binzenhöfer et al., 2005) or other geographical variables (like geographic coordina”
Effects of landscape and habitat quality on butterfly communities in pre-alpine calcareous grasslands (2012, methodology): “Patch connectivity We measured edge-to-edge distance from the study patches to neighboring calcareous grassland patches in the study area using the cost-distance model (Adriaensen et al., 2003; Chardon et al., 2003).”
Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis (2010, background): “In many cases, especially with categorical variables (i.e. land cover), the researcher hypothesizes arbitrary costs based on the perceived relative costs among variables (e.g. Chardon et al. 2003; Broquet et al. 2006).”
A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study (2007, background): “…by considering the variable movement bilities and mortality risk of a species through different land over types (Tischendorf and Fahrig, 2000b; Ray et al., 2002; driaensen et al., 2003; Chardon et al., 2003; Nikolakaki, 2004; evilla et al., 2004; Marull and Mallarach, 2005; Theobald, 006).”