Evidence of causality between the quantity and quality of energy consumption and economic growth
By Benjamin S. Warr, Robert U. Ayres. 2010
245 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4e8b5a9c0e96bb9faf0730c18da0fb0d609a3cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- S. Sorrell
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- J. Steinberger
- T. Foxon
- H. Schandl
- F. Krausmann
- N. Eisenmenger
- J. Barrett
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- S. Sorrell
- F. Krausmann
- Jason Hickel
- N. Eisenmenger
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- H. Schandl
- J. Steinberger
- T. Foxon
Citations in the corpus
- A meta-analysis investigation of the direction of the energy-GDP causal relationship: implications for the growth-degrowth dialogue (2014, methodology): “…and renewable energy consumption or production (Apergis and Payne, 2011, 2012, 2012; Bithas and Banti, 2002; Payne, 2011b; Tiwari, 2011), as well as an exergy approach (Warr and Ayres, 2010) and the use of the divisia index of quality weighted energy consumption (Stern, 1993, 2000; Zarnikau, 1997).”
- Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network (2016, methodology): “Traditionally, fossil fuels are usually aggregated in the units of thermal equivalents, but this method fails to reflect the qualitative differences among energy inputs [3].”
- Energy use and economic development: A comparative analysis of useful work supply in Austria, Japan, the United Kingdom and the US during 100 years of economic growth (2010, background): “…that exergy analysis provides an approach for the better integration of ‘productive energy use’ in economic growth theory through inclusion of useful work in the production function having shown that useful work supplied to an economy is ‘Granger’ causal to output growth (Warr and Ayres, 2010).”
- Energy rebound as a potential threat to a low-carbon future: findings from a new exergy-based national-level rebound approach (2017, methodology): “Including U as the energy input has support in the wider economic literature—various researchers including Ayres and Warr [50,76] and Voudouris et al.”
- Causality Between Energy and Output in the Long-Run (2013, unknown): “Warr and Ayres (2010) replicate this model for the U.S. using their measures of exergy and useful work in place of Stern’s Divisia index of energy use.”
- Time-Varying Analysis of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth Nexus: Statistical Experience in Next 11 Countries (2016, background): “For instance, some studies find evidence of a unidirectional causality running from energy consumption to economic growth (e.g. Stern 2000, Chontanawat et al. 2008, Bowden and Payne 2009, Warr and Ayres 2010).”
- A Green New Deal without growth? (2021, background): “Consequently, to ensure economic growth in the long run it is necessary to increase energy supplies and/or the rate of energy efficiency (Warr and Ayres, 2010).”