TRAIT‐MEDIATED INDIRECT EFFECTS IN LARVAL ANURANS: REVERSING COMPETITION WITH THE THREAT OF PREDATION

By Rick A. Relyea. 2000

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4d8a15a418be329b5684ad74502f3627fd762dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Reduced burst speed is a cost of rapid growth in anuran tadpoles: problems of autocorrelation and inferences about growth rates (2003, background): “In addition, differences in perceived risk of predation can have profound effects on competitive interactions within populations (e.g. Reinhardt 1999; Relyea 2000), which will feedback into realized growth rates dependent upon food intake.”
Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment (2003, unknown): “increasing attention from ecologists (Turner and Mittelbach 1990, Huang and Sih 1991, McIntosh and Townsend 1996, Beckerman et al. 1997, Peacor and Werner 1997, Turner 1997, Peckarsky and McIntosh 1998, Relyea 2000, Abrams et al. 1996, reviewed in Werner and Peacor 2003, and Bolker et al. 2003).”
PREDATOR- AND COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY: HOW CHANGES IN FORAGING MORPHOLOGY AFFECT PHENOTYPIC TRADE-OFFS (2005, background): “Little research has examined the impact of predators on prey mouthparts although Relyea (2000) found that adding caged predators reversed the effect of competitor induction on the longest tooth row.”
THE MANY FACES OF PREDATION: HOW INDUCTION, SELECTION, AND THINNING COMBINE TO ALTER PREY PHENOTYPES (2002, methodology): “1 in Relyea 2000).”
Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour (2002, background): “…have shown how predator presence can lead to a reduction in prey growth rate, indicating that the negative effect was stronger than the opposing indirect positive effect (e.g. Werner et al. 1983; Van Buskirk & Yurewicz 1998; Nakaoka 2000; Relyea 2000; McPeek et al. 2001; Peckarsky et al. 2001).”
COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES: CONSEQUENCES, CUES, AND CONNECTIONS TO PREDATOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY (2002, background): “…tail length, maximum tail depth, maximum tail muscle depth, maximum body length, and maximum body depth; from the dorsal view, I measured the maximum tail muscle width, the maximum body width, and the maximal mouth width (the widest denticle row; for a photograph of dimensions, see Relyea 2000).”
Ecological Developmental Biology: Developmental Biology Meets the Real World1 (2001, background): “While a morph is the term usually given to alternate anatomical phenotypes instructed by the environment, there are often alternative behavioral phenotypes associated with these morphs (see Relyea, 2000c).”
Plasticity constrained: over-generalized induction cues cause maladaptive phenotypes (2002, background): “More recently, the emphasis has shifted from simply documenting case after case of adaptive plasticity to addressing constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity (Via et al., 1995; DeWitt et al., 1998) and effects of plasticity on community ecology (Chase, 1999; Relyea, 2000).”
A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES (2003, background): “For example , morphological responses to predators have been documented in protists, rotifers, cladocerans and various other crustaceans, bryozoans, gastropods, fish, and amphibians (Harvell 1990, Bronmark and Miner 1992, McCollum and VanBuskirk 1996, Relyea and Werner 2000).”
Interactive effects of predators and a pesticide on aquatic communities (2008, unknown): “... 1) wood frogs were either foraging on periphyton that was higher up on the sides of the mesocosm (analogous to shallower water that would be less shaded by phytoplankton blooms), 2) wood frogs were able to sustain themselves on lower quality periphyton than leopard frogs (Schiesari 2006), or 3) ”
Multiple prey traits, multiple predators: keys to understanding complex community dynamics (2003, background): “For instance, Relyea (2000) found that predatorinduced morphological plasticity in tadpoles altered competitive interactions among tadpoles.”
MORPHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY OF LARVAL ANURANS IN RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT PREDATORS (2001, result): “This pattern has been repeated in several other experiments in which the predator-induced change in behavior or morphology of prey has resulted in altered growth and development (Sih 1987, Lima and Dill 1990, Skelly 1992, Werner and Anholt 1996, Relyea and Werner 1999, Relyea 2000)”