Factors influencing primary school children's knowledge of wildlife
By M. Huxham, A. Welsh, Alice Berry, S. Templeton. 2006
83 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We examined the wildlife knowledge of primary (aged 4–12) schoolchildren. In particular, we examined the effects of children's age and gender, as well as the taxonomy and origin (indigenous versus exotic) of wildlife, on the degree of knowledge about different species.We used illustrated ‘flashcards’ of mammals, birds and arthropods, drawn randomly from a species pool. Each indigenous example was paired with an exotic animal. Wildlife knowledge overall increased steadily with age, although the ability to identify species peaked at age 9 then declined slightly. Boys had significantly greater wildlife knowledge than girls, and children of both sexes identified more indigenous than exotic species. Knowledge of mammals was significantly better than that of birds and arthropods. Knowledge of some very common indigenous species, such as sparrow and earwig, was poor.We conclude that the potential for primary school wildlife education using common and easily accessible species of birds and arthropods is not fully realised, and that girls in particular lack knowledge of local species.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4882c57ea5baf7a6e4cd20ae911909ff1112401
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Nordic–Baltic Student Teachers’ Identification of and Interest in Plant and Animal Species: The Importance of Species Identification and Biodiversity for Sustainable Development (2015, background): “These results are in line with previous research, where outdoor education has proved to have a positive effect on students’ knowledge about and attitude to species (Braun et al., 2010; Evans et al., 2006; Fančovičová & Prokop, 2011; Huxham et al., 2006; Palmberg & Kuru, 2000).”