Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment

By Amy Jocelyn Glass, Kamal Saggi. 2002

549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e474697d85e8ad002296c9ae8fa9f0ee637f331b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean (2011, unknown): “Journal of World Business (2010), doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2010.07.015 and temporary solution to the misappropriation of IPRs in weak IPR countries, because the risk of unauthorized imitation can be ongoing (Glass & Saggi, 2002).”
Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth Literature Review from 1994 to 2012 (2014, unknown): “Horizontal FDI (HFDI) is a type of investment which is in the same industry operating abroad as a firm operate, or offers the same services as it does at home, and tends to produce for local or original markets only without exporting much output to host country ( (Maskus, 2002); (Haile & Assefa, 200”
Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data (2006, unknown): “Theoretical work by Helpman (1993), Lai (1998), Glass and Saggi (2002) , and Grossman and Lai (2005) demonstrates that this may not occur.”
Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation (2001, unknown): “See Nickell et al. (1997), and Aghion et al.”
Intellectual property rights and quality improvement (2007, background): “And by comparison to Glass and Saggi (2002), we will be able to determine whether the effects of weak IPR protection in the absence of FDI depend on whether imitation is modeled exogenously.”
Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A disaggregated analysis (2004, background): “As concerns industry characteristics, Maskus (1998, 2000) posits that IPR protection is more important for FDI in industries with considerable intellectualproperty-related ownership advantages than for FDI in services as well as in low-tech and standardized manufacturing.”
Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Development (2011, unknown): “For criticisms of stronger IPRs which stress static welfare losses, see McCalman (2001) and Chaudhuri et al. (2006). and Lai (1998) both of which utilized the variety expansion model and Glass and Saggi (2002) who adopted the quality ladders approach.”
Property rights protection and corporate R&D: Evidence from China (2010, background): “…been extensive studies of the effects of intellectual property rights (IPRs) protection on R&D in developing countries during the past two decades, often in a North-South framework (see, e.g., Grossman and Helpman, 1991; Helpman, 1993; Glass and Saggi, 2002; Branstetter, Fisman and Foley 2006) .”
Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth (2003, background): “Contrary to Lai (1998a), when DFI does not play a central role in international technology diDusion, stronger Southern IPR can lead to lower rate of innovation, such as in Helpman (1993), Grossman and Helpman (1991b) and Glass and Saggi (2002).”
Collecting the Pieces of the FDI Knowledge Spillovers Puzzle (2008, background): “Many of the studies reviewed by Go¨rg and Strobl (2001) and Go¨rg and Greenaway (2004) implicitly deal with knowledge spillovers through demonstration effects, as the majority look for horizontal (intraindustry) knowledge spill-overs.”