COMPETITION AND TIME OF DAMAGE AFFECT THE PATTERN OF SELECTION ACTING ON PLANT DEFENSE AGAINST HERBIVORES

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Resistance and tolerance in Populus tremuloides: genetic variation, costs, and environmental dependency (2007, background): “In the absence of herbivores, however, only the costs and not the benefits of a defense are observed ( Tiffin 2002 ).”
A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies (2006, methodology): “In cases where correlation coefficients were not given and no data were presented allowing the calculation of a correlation, we asked the authors of these papers to provide us with the necessary correlations ( Tiffin 2002, Prittinen et al. 2003).”
RESISTANCE AND SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MILKWEED: COMPETITION, ROOT HERBIVORY, AND PLANT GENETIC VARIATION (2004, methodology): “Nonetheless, plant competition did not affect the pattern of natural selection on plant resistance or tolerance to herbivory (Tiffin 2002).”
Evolution in a Community Context: Trait Responses to Multiple Species Interactions* (2018, unknown): “For example, Tiffin (2002) quantified selection on antiherbivore defenses in morning glories and found that selection in response to herbivores was similar regardless of whether a crabgrass competitor was present.”
Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. (2005, background): “For example, defense and tolerance can be alternative strategies as plants develop [ 1 ], produce resource tradeoffs, or be genetically correlated.”