Long Distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Number Long Distance Agreement in (Substandard) Basque (2006, unknown): “I will show that, as Chomsky wants, Case performs a mediating function in the checking of uninterpretable phi-features of the Probe, but that the notion of active Goal in terms of unchecked Case features plays no role (as has been argued for Hindi by Bhatt 2005).”
Morphological and Abstract Case (2008, background): “49 The data discussed in Bobaljik 2006 regarding domains involve long-distance agreement; for details, see Polinsky and Potsdam 2001 and Polinsky 2003 (for Tsez), Branigan and MacKenzie 2002 (for Innu-aimûn), Bhatt 2005 (for Hindi).”
Delayed Valuation: A Reanalysis of Goal Features, “Upward” Complementizer Agreement, and the Mechanics of Case (2016, background): “See also Bhatt 2005, Bobaljik & Wurmbrand 2005 for analyses of some long-distance agreement in terms of restructuring, and Polinsky & Potsdam 2001 for arguments that long-distance agreement in Tzez is mediated by a null topic in Spec of the embedded CP. 19A reviewer asks about embedded…”
Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns (2009, background): “I also neglect case features throughout this article, which seems legitimate in light of Bhatt 2005, which argues for a dissociation of case and agreement.”
On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory (2007, background): “(Bhatt (2005) also suggests this.)”