Morphological and Abstract Case

By J. Legate. Linguistic Inquiry, 2008

412 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf903fefada8f884e5d573a1bd9a6847a705d6da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kay González-Vilbazo
2. L. Lopez
3. Mark C. Baker
4. Sandra Chung

In Language and Linguistics

1. Kay González-Vilbazo
2. L. Lopez
3. Mark C. Baker
4. Sandra Chung
5. Ruth Kramer
6. M. Diercks
7. Christopher Potts
8. R. Zanuttini

Citations in the corpus

• On the Relationship of Object Agreement and Accusative Case: Evidence from Amharic (2012, background): “In this respect, Amharic is rather like German, where morphological case distinctions have been lost on N but not on D; see also Legate 2008 for discussion of the homophony at PF of nominative and accusative on some categories but not others in various Australian languages.”
• Little v and parametric variation (2012, background): “Likewise, v is involved in variation of Case assignment, as argued by Legate (2008).”
• Syntactic Identity in Sluicing: How Much and Why (2013, background): “Importantly, the relevant notion is abstract Case, not morphological case (see Rothstein 1992, Legate 2008), so the identity involved is clearly syntactic identity.”