Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns

By Angelika Kratzer. Linguistic Inquiry, 2009

451 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08b8a1fcb095511e74267fe61a99d4b40a4a9bf2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds (2012, background): “…aspect of pronominal meaning as presuppositional, where presuppositions are understood as conditions on definedness (cf. Cooper 1983, Heim 2008, Kratzer 2009).31 I adopt a slight variation on the standard version of this approach; on my account, the semantics of I and you are given as…”
Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence (2013, background): “For reflexive–antecedent relations, agreement reflects a referential dependency between two noun phrases (Baker, 2008; Kratzer, 2009), whereas subject– verb agreement is a formal morphosyntactic mechanism for indexing participants in an event (Corbett, 2006).”
A Two-Tiered Theory of Control (2015, background): “The bound variable reading of (59b) survives with a [3SG] possessive pronoun because its binder, the relative pronoun who, is doubly specified for 1 st person and 3 rd (or no) person, (64b) (see Kratzer 2009 for details).”
Presuppositions and the Alternative Tier (2013, background): “In particular, I have shown that a bound pronoun agreement mechanism is unnecessary at least for what have been held to be core cases of the phenomenon by Kratzer (2009) and others.”
Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis (2014, background): “…and the adjective enter the derivation without φ-feature specifications (e.g., D:[φ :__ ] ) and acquire them under Agree with masc (see Baker, 2008; Kratzer, 2009); this is consistent with the architectural assumption that Agree happens on a branch of the derivation that does not feed LF (if…”
On Labeling: Principle C and Head Movement (2010, background): “For example, Kratzer (2009) defends an approach along this line and explicitly rejects the idea that unbound third-person pronouns are free variables in the sense of formal logic.”
DP-internal semantic agreement: A configurational analysis (2016, background): “Second, Smith takes it for granted that -features on anaphors are interpreted (and therefore must be valued in the syntax), but this assumption has been contested on principled grounds (Heim 2008, Kratzer 2009).”