Intraindividual variability in performance as a theoretical window onto cognitive aging
By D. Hultsch, S. MacDonald. 2004
169 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3bcd64d69f0fd4c226323f38969bd8dbb2a05d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- The Victoria Longitudinal Study: From Characterizing Cognitive Aging to Illustrating Changes in Memory Compensation (2004, background): “…has not previously been investigated, although the study of individual variability is of growing theoretical and practical significance in the field of aging (e.g., Dixon & Hertzog, 1996; Hertzog, Dixon, & Hultsch, 1992; Hultsch & MacDonald, 2004; Nesselroade, 1991; Nesselroade & Featherman, 1991).”
- Emphasizing Intraindividual Variability in the Study of Development Over the Life Span (2010, background): “More recent, quite illuminating portrayals of the nature of intraindividual variability include those by Hultsch and MacDonald (2003), Hultsch, Strauss, Hunter, and MacDonald (2008), Moskowitz and Hershberger (2002), and Overton (2006).”
- Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. (2006, background): “Hultsch and MacDonald (2004) reviewed the evidence linking cognitive aging to three types of RT variability: interindividual variability, intraindividual variability across tasks, and intraindividual variability within tasks, which they referred to as “diversity,” “dispersion,” and “inconsistency,”…”