Emphasizing Intraindividual Variability in the Study of Development Over the Life Span

By J. Nesselroade, Peter C. M. Molenaar. 2010

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/277a07ba7bdc490dd6ecc56d776b98212eabfe8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. W. Overton
2. Kristina Schmid Callina
3. R. Lerner
4. A. Masten
5. David C. Witherington
6. J. Lerner
7. Kristina L. Schmid
8. Michelle J. Boyd

Citations in the corpus

• The Study of Character Development: Towards Tests of a Relational Developmental Systems Model (2015, methodology): “Indeed, methodological work framed by RDS concepts [e.g., Molenaar & Nesselroade, 2014, 2015; Nesselroade, 1988; Nesselroade & Molenaar, 2010] indicates that the purported life-span stability of traits, as well as the purported immunity to contextual influences, are empirically counterfactual.”
• A New Paradigm for Developmental Science: Relationism and Relational-Developmental Systems (2013, methodology): “…and concepts (Mueller & Racine 2010); (i) methods in the study of intradividual variability across the life span (Molenaar & Nesselroade, 2012; Nesselroade & Molenaar, 2010); (j) the development of reasoning (Ricco & Overton, 2011); (k) developmental psychopathology (Marshall, in press;…”