The peasantries of the twenty-first century: the commoditisation debate revisited
By Jan Douwe van der Ploeg. 2010
279 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3b26b66aa94239fc23501551756618a30ae7872
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Jan Douwe van der Ploeg
- S. Schneider
- B. Cousins
- P. Niederle
- Jingzhong Ye
- E. Holt-gimenez
- M. Altieri
- Manuel González de Molina
In Sociology and Political Science
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Resistance strategies and diversification of rural livelihoods: the construction of autonomy among Brazilian family farmers (2010, background): “For Ploeg (2010, 16), these ‘resistance of the third kind’ mechanisms are the basis for what can be designated ‘repeasantization’ – a qualitative process materialising the ‘peasant mode of farming’.2 In this way, innovative practices reconnect agriculture, society, and nature.”
- Smallholder Irrigation Schemes, Agrarian Reform and ‘Accumulation from Above and from Below’ in South Africa (2013, background): “2 For alternative formulations of the contemporary agrarian question, see McMichael (2009), Watts (2009) and van der Ploeg (2010).”
- Rural development through the construction of new, nested, markets: comparative perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union (2012, background): “Poulantzas (1974) saw a social relation of production as having two features: (a) it (re-) constitutes specific processes of labour and production, and (b) it (re-) defines the distribution of the wealth produced.”
- Agroecology, Food Sovereignty, and the New Green Revolution (2012, background): “…knowledge systems, and smallholder’s pluriactive livelihood strategies preserve peasant farming systems, presenting barriers and competition for capitalist agriculture (Wilken 1988; Netting 1993), and resulting in the “persistence of the peasantry” (Edelman 2000, 14; see also van der Ploeg 2010).”