Contextual cueing of visual attention

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Interrupting the Workplace: Examining Stressors in an Information Technology Context (2015, background): “In addition to increased frequency, the lack of these interruptions’ contextual cues manifest into negative outcomes, such as increased ambiguity and conflict with the individual’s current workload (Chun, 2000).”
Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. (2006, background): “It relies on past experience to learn the relationship between target locations and global scene features (Biederman, Mezzanotte & Rabinowitz, 1982; Brockmole & Henderson, in press; Brockmole & Henderson, 2006; Brockmole, Castelhano & Henderson, in press; Chun & Jiang, 1998; 1999; Chun, 2000; Hidalg”
Visual search: a retrospective. (2011, background): “Upon repeated presentations, search times are reduced to locate targets in previously viewed conﬁgurations (e.g., Figure 4b; Brockmole, Hambrick, Windisch, & Henderson, 2008; Chun, 2000; Chun & Jiang, 1998; Hollingworth, 2009).”
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search (2021, background): “In contextual cueing, Os come to respond faster to repeated displays than to novel displays, as if the Os had come to anticipate where the target would appear even though they had no explicit idea that the displays had been repeating (Chun, 2000).”
Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search (2007, background): “For example, contextual cueing effects might be modeled by assuming that items in the cued location start at a point closer to the target threshold (Chun, 2000; Chun & Jiang, 1998).”
Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context (2002, methodology): “We have begun to explore these issues using a paradigm termed contextual cueing ( Chun, 2000; Chun & Jiang, 1998, 1999; Chun & Phelps, 1999).”
How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? (2005, background): “More generally, visual context has been shown to guide attention toward potential target objects (for a review see Chun, 2000).”
A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, unknown): “Beyond visual factors, visual search is facilitated when targets appear in predictable locations, cued by background context and past experience (Bar et al. 2004, Chun 2000, Torralba et al. 2006).”
Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search (2006, background): “Brockmole & John M. Henderson (2006): Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search, Visual Cognition, 13:1, 99-108”
SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching With Graph Neural Networks (2019, background): “When asked to match a given ambiguous keypoint, humans look back-and-forth at both images: they sift through tentative matching keypoints, examine each, and look for contextual cues that help disambiguate the true match from other self-similarities [10].”
What speakers do and what addressees look at: visual attention to gestures in human interaction live and on video (2006, unknown): “First, the mean accumulated fixation time on various objects in the scene during the interaction gives a general overview of interaction as a scene type (cf. Buswell 1935; Chun 2000; Yarbus 1967).”