Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective☆

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Habit and hedonic motivation are the strongest influences in mobile learning behaviours among higher education students in Malaysia (2019, background): “Gender (GT) has also been found to moderate the effects of social influence (Faqih & Jaradat, 2015; Venkatesh et al., 2012; Wang, Wu, & Wang, 2009).”
Exploring consumers perceived risk and trust for mobile shopping: A theoretical framework and empirical study (2018, background): “Despite some studies reporting no behavioural intention differences between ages and genders (e.g. Faqih and Jaradat, 2015; Yang et al., 2015) understanding into risk and trust can be further enhanced through examination into consumer demographics; for example, Natarajan, et al. (2017) highlight…”
Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity (2017, neutral): “(Wu and Wang, 2005; Yang, 2005; Hung et al., 2007; Tsu Wei et al., 2009; Chong et al., 2012; Chong, 2013; Lu, 2014; Agrebi and Jallais, 2015; Faqih and Jaradat, 2015; Wang et al., 2015).”