A SURVEY OF z ∼ 6 QUASARS IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY DEEP STRIPE. I. A FLUX-LIMITED SAMPLE AT zAB < 21

By Linhua Jiang, Xiaohui Fan, James Annis, Robert H. Becker, R. White, K. Chiu, Huan Lin, Robert Lupton, Gordon Richards, M. Strauss and 2 more. 2007

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the discovery of five quasars at z ∼ 6 selected from 260 deg2 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) southern survey, a deep imaging survey obtained by repeatedly scanning a stripe along the celestial equator. The five quasars with 20 < zAB < 21 are 1–2 magnitudes fainter than the luminous z ∼ 6 quasars discovered in the SDSS main survey. One of them was independently discovered by the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey. These quasars, combined with another z ∼ 6 quasar known in this region, make a complete flux-limited quasar sample at zAB < 21. The sample spans the redshift range 5.85 ⩽ z ⩽ 6.12 and the luminosity range −26.5 ⩽ M1450 ⩽ −25.4 (H0 = 70 km s−1 Mpc−1, Ωm = 0.3, and ΩΛ = 0.7). We use the 1/Va method to determine that the comoving quasar spatial density at 〈z〉 = 6.0 and 〈M1450〉 = −25.8 is (5.0 ± 2.1) × 10−9 Mpc−3 mag−1. We model the bright-end quasar luminosity function (QLF) at z ∼ 6 as a power law Φ(L1450) ∝ Lβ1450. The slope β calculated from a combination of our sample and the luminous SDSS quasar sample is −3.1 ± 0.4, significantly steeper than the slope of the QLF at z ∼ 4. Based on the derived QLF, we find that the quasar/active galactic nucleus (AGN) population cannot provide enough photons to ionize the intergalactic medium (IGM) at z ∼ 6 unless the IGM is very homogeneous and the luminosity (L*1450) at which the QLF power law breaks is very low.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3426d25005d6f70c62dbf7d37f01fd72d1a7d00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. J. Brinkmann
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. Simon D. M. White
  6. M. Blanton
  7. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  8. F. V. D. Bosch

Citations in the corpus