BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATES AND EMISSION-LINE PROPERTIES OF A SAMPLE OF REDSHIFT z > 6.5 QUASARS

By G. de Rosa, B. Venemans, R. Decarli, M. Gennaro, R. Simcoe, M. Dietrich, B. Peterson, F. Walter, S. Frank, R. McMahon and 3 more. 2013

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the analysis of optical and near-infrared spectra of the only four z > 6.5 quasars known to date, discovered in the UKIDSS-LAS and VISTA-VIKING surveys. Our data set consists of new Very Large Telescope/X-Shooter and Magellan/FIRE observations. These are the best optical/NIR spectroscopic data that are likely to be obtained for the z > 6.5 sample using current 6–10 m facilities. We estimate the black hole (BH) mass, the Eddington ratio, and the Si iv/C iv, C iii]/C iv, and Fe ii/Mg ii emission-line flux ratios. We perform spectral modeling using a procedure that allows us to derive a probability distribution for the continuum components and to obtain the quasar properties weighted upon the underlying distribution of continuum models. The z > 6.5 quasars show the same emission properties as their counterparts at lower redshifts. The z > 6.5 quasars host BHs with masses of ∼109 M☉ that are accreting close to the Eddington luminosity (〈log(LBol/LEdd)〉 = −0.4 ± 0.2), in agreement with what has been observed for a sample of 4.0 < z < 6.5 quasars. By comparing the Si iv/C iv and C iii]/C iv flux ratios with the results obtained from luminosity-matched samples at z ∼ 6 and 2 ⩽ z ⩽ 4.5, we find no evidence of evolution of the line ratios with cosmic time. We compare the measured Fe ii/Mg ii flux ratios with those obtained for a sample of 4.0 < z < 6.4 sources. The two samples are analyzed using a consistent procedure. There is no evidence that the Fe ii/Mg ii flux ratio evolves between z = 7 and z = 4. Under the assumption that the Fe ii/Mg ii traces the Fe/Mg abundance ratio, this implies the presence of major episodes of chemical enrichment in the quasar hosts in the first ∼0.8 Gyr after the Big Bang.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d3e9ed14c4b6312e9043840b7ebba73c9eb1cf1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. F. Walter
  2. C. Carilli
  3. Xiaohui Fan
  4. D. Riechers
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. Hans-Walter Rix
  7. M. Strauss
  8. P. Hopkins

Citations in the corpus