Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 1.
By R. Kloner, R. Jennings. Circulation, 2001
608 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3409761c16219b38fe8efe371d531ec07f85971
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- P. Ferdinandy
- R. Schulz
- Zhi-Qing Zhao
- G. Baxter
- Ningping Wang
- Michael E. Halkos
- J. Corvera
- Faraz Kerendi
Citations in the corpus
- Interaction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Preconditioning, and Postconditioning (2007, background): “This condition of delayed, but ultimately complete, recovery of contractile function after reperfusion of viable tissue is called “myocardial stunning” (Braunwald and Kloner, 1982; Kloner and Jennings, 2001).”
- Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. (2003, background): “Short periods (<15 minutes) of coronary artery occlusion cause contractile dysfunction in the absence of infarction; this recovery of myocardial stunning takes at least 6 hours.(16) However, contractile dysfunction in irreversibly damaged (infarcted)”