28 GHz millimeter wave cellular communication measurements for reflection and penetration loss in and around buildings in New York city

By Hang Zhao, Rimma Mayzus, Shu Sun, Mathew Samimi, Jocelyn K. Schulz, Yaniv Azar, Kevin Wang, George N. Wong, Felix Gutierrez, Theodore Ted S. Rappaport. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2013

443 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e32e52b3a83d9a3531c9a368dc1ad4a67991b60d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Millimeter-Wave Cellular Wireless Networks: Potentials and Challenges (2014, background): “Also, the human body and many outdoor materials being very reflective allow them to be important scatterers for mmW propagation [28], [30].”
A Comprehensive Survey on Millimeter Wave Communications for Fifth-Generation Wireless Networks: Feasibility and Challenges (2020, methodology): “In [55], themmWavemeasurement campaign conducted at 28 GHz band finds that, compared to indoor building materials that are less reflective, outdoor building materials are better reflectors with the most significant measured reflection coefficient of 0.”
Joint Spatial Division and Multiplexing for mm-Wave Channels (2013, unknown): “5 dBi gain, or 10◦ half beamwidth) [4], [6], [24].”
Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results (2014, background): “Along with the aforementioned laboratory measurements, there have been recent studies regarding the outdoor channel propagation characteristics that have shown the potential for utilizing higher frequency bands for cellular communications [10] [11] [12] [13] [14].”
A Survey of 5G Channel Measurements and Models (2018, background): “More detailed reﬂection coefﬁcients and penetration losses of different materials at mmWave bands were reported in [61]–[63].”
A survey of millimeter wave communications (mmWave) for 5G: opportunities and challenges (2015, methodology): “Ghosh et al. [101] made a case for using mmWave bands, in particular the 28, 38, 71–76 and 81–86 GHz bands for the 5G enhanced local area (eLA) access.”
A variegated look at 5G in the wild: performance, power, and QoE implications (2021, background): “Despite numerous studies on modeling and simulation of mmWave links [27, 29, 34, 35, 50, 67, 68, 70], the impact of mmWave on commercial 5G performance, power consumption, as well as mobile application Qualityof-Experience (QoE) is largely under-explored.”
Enabling UAV cellular with millimeter-wave communication: potentials and approaches (2016, background): “In [13], measurements have shown that outdoor (where UAV mmWave communications typica lly occur) building materials are excellent reflectors, with the reflection coefficient as l arge as 0.”
End-to-End Simulation of 5G mmWave Networks (2017, background): “ceptible to shadowing and can be completely blocked by many materials such as brick, tinted glass and even the human body [34], [35].”
Millimeter Wave Cellular Networks: A MAC Layer Perspective (2015, background): “The human body can attenuate mmWave signals by 35 dB [9], and materials such as brick attenuate them by as much as 80 dB [5], [10]–[12].”
Millimeter-Wave Communications: Physical Channel Models, Design Considerations, Antenna Constructions, and Link-Budget (2018, methodology): “reported in [58] that at 28 GHz, the outdoor materials appear to be more reflective than their indoor counterparts.”
Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models for Future Wireless Communication System Design (2015, methodology): “Initial tests were performed at 28 GHz and 40 GHz to study penetration losses for common obstructions such as wood, water, hands, and leaves [33], [92].”