The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems
By D. Rohrer. 2009
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e30dfa841dbe7c2ce0e29a7a3be28e27c62e6ae7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Surya Ganguli
- Trevor Darrell
- Jascha Narain Sohl-Dickstein
- Dacheng Tao
- Quoc V. Le
- Sergey Levine
- Kaiming He
Citations in the corpus
- Deep Knowledge Tracing (2015, methodology): “In Section 6.1 we compare solving this problem using expectimax to two classic curricula rules from education literature: mixing where exercises from different topics are intermixed, and blocking where students answer series of exercises of the same type [30].”
- Spaced Repetition Promotes Efficient and Effective Learning (2016, background): “While an interleaved schedule does inherently introduce spacing between repetitions, interleaving is a distinct intervention from spacing (Rohrer, 2009).”
- Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts (2012, background): “This might partly explain the notorious difficulty of word problems (Rohrer 2009).”
- The effects of interleaved practice (2010, unknown): “…of learning (for reviews, see, for example, Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2006; Dempster, 1987; Bjork, 1994; Donovan & Radosevich, 1999; Rohrer, 2009; for experimental papers, see, for example, Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E., 1993; Bloom & Shuell,…”
- Envisioning the Future of Special Education Personnel Preparation in a Standards-Based Era (2015, background): “Distributed practice requires learners to tap into their memories to retrieve knowledge about different problems and such opportunities to rehearse existing knowledge leads to deeper, long-term learning (Rohrer, 2009; Willingham, 2014).”