Theory and Research in Mass Communication

By J. Bryant, D. Miron. 2004

588 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2d4d700e2b5eaeb76c41b63537f9635abb5908a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

Citations in the corpus

Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate (2009, methodology): “In the beginning of the 21st century, selective exposure, including politically motivated selectivity, has emerged as one of the most commonly used theories in communication scholarship (Bryant & Miron, 2004).”
Understanding the Third‐Person Perception: Evidence From a Meta‐Analysis (2008, background): “In recent years, TPE has become ‘‘one of the most popular theories’’ in communication research (Bryant & Miron, 2004).”
Tweeting From Left to Right (2015, background): “, 2001) if we treat Twitter as a social networking site, and also as the result of users’ selective exposure to ideologically congenial content (Lazarsfeld et al., 1944; Bryant and Miron, 2004), if we consider Twitter as a news media (Kwak et al.”
Can the Media Discipline Chinese Firms’ Pollution Behaviors? The Mediating Effects of the Public and Government (2016, methodology): “We integrate agenda-setting theory (Jennings & Miron, 2004; Walgrave & van Aelst, 2006) with stakeholder theory (Freeman, 1984; Frooman, 1999; Mitchell, Agle, & Wood, 1997) to investigate how the media influence Chinese firms’ pollution behaviors through such primary stakeholders as the government…”
The Evolution of Media Effects Theory: A Six-Stage Model of Cumulative Research (2011, methodology): “…and Bachen (1981), Bryant and Zillmann (1986, 1994), Delia (1987), DeFleur and Ball-Rokeach (1988), Jeffres (1997), Katz (2001b), Perse (2001), Bryant and Thompson (2002b), Bryant and Miron (2004), Preiss, Gayle, Burrell, Allen, and Bryant (2007), Keppinger (2008), and Nabi and Oliver (2009).”
Media Effects: Theory and Research. (2016, background): “Several bibliographic analyses have tried to document the state of the art of both micro-and macro-level media effects theories in the scholarly journals (Bryant & Miron 2004, Potter 2012, Potter & Riddle 2007).”
Contributing to Theory and Knowledge in Quantitative Communication Science (2012, methodology): “We are not providing critiques of communication theory, as have been offered by several communication scholars (Bryant & Miron, 2004; Pavitt, 2000, 2009).”
Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model (2013, methodology): “The DSMM builds upon earlier individual-level media-effects theories that have been identified as well-cited theories in the reviews of Bryant and Miron (2004), Potter and Riddle (2007), and Potter (2012).”
Fictional Narratives Cultivate Just‐World Beliefs (2008, background): “After much criticism (see Shanahan & Morgan, 1999, for a review), cultivation theory remains one of the most dominant theories in mass communication research of the 21st century, as indicated by frequency of use in the high-quality communication journals (Bryant & Miron, 2004).”
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017, background): “S1 to S3 Tables S1 to S19 References (1-21)”
On the Interpretation of Digital Trace Data in Communication and Social Computing Research (2014, methodology): “For communication, a master list was created of all journals reviewed in two landmark studies of the theoretical history of communication research (Bryant & Miron, 2004; Graber & Smith, 2005).”
The Roles of Interpersonal Communication in Mass Media Campaigns (2007, background): “Bryant and Miron (2004) have observed: For example, (a) all of the media of mass communication are undergoing dramatic changes in form, content, and substance … (b) newer forms of interactive media … are altering the traditional mass communication model from that of communication of one-to-many to…”