R u txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?
By Michelle A. Drouin, Claire Davis. 2009
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2cdd867388cd0fa4ae891b396817e75f9dce0cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Literature and Literary Theory
In Human-Computer Interaction
Citations in the corpus
- What to do about bad language on the internet (2013, background): “A survey of laypeo-1 boyd and Crawford (2012) note that “public by default” data still raises important ethical considerations. ple found that more than half of the respondents agreed with the following partial explanations for non-standard spelling on the internet: “people are unsure of the…”
- Text-message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students (2012, background): “It seems likely that standard patterns will emerge over time, and some textisms are already widely used and recognised, for example 4 for for and b for be (e.g., Crystal, 2008; Drouin & Davis, 2009).”
- Texting while stressed: Implications for students’ burnout, sleep, and well-being. (2013, background): “…of increased cell phone use have been considered in terms of a variety of domains such as social relationships (Kabat-Zinn, 2005), communication skills (Drouin & Davis, 2009), academic performance (Junco, 2012), and personal and public safety (Drews, Yazdani, Godfrey, Cooper, & Strayer, 2009).”
- Measuring Affect for the Study and Enhancement of Co-present Creative Collaboration (2013, background): “There is, however, an increasing amount of evidence to suggest that these changes are significant, affecting the way we interact [5]–[8], and the way we think [9].”