Photometric characterization of exoplanets using angular and spectral differential imaging

By A. Vigan, C. Moutou, Maud Langlois, F. Allard, Anthony Boccaletti, M. Carbillet, David Mouillet, I. Smith. 2010

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In recent years, there has been intensive research into the direct detection of exoplanets. Data obtained in the future with high-contrast imaging instruments, optimized for the direct detection of giant planets, may be strongly limited by speckle noise. Specific observing strategies and data analysis methods, such as angular and spectral differential imaging, are required to attenuate the noise level and possibly to detect the flux of faint planets. Even though these methods are very efficient at suppressing the speckles, the photometry of faint planets is dominated by the speckle residuals. The determination of the effective temperature and surface gravity of the detected planets from photometric measurements in different bands is then limited by the photometric error on the planet flux. In this paper, we investigate this photometric error and the consequences on the determination of the physical parameters of the detected planets. We perform detailed end-to-end simulation with the CAOS-based software package for spectro-polarimetric high-contrast exoplanet research (SPHERE) to obtain realistic data representing typical observing sequences in the Y, J, H and K s bands with a high-contrast imager. The simulated data are used to measure the photometric accuracy as a function of contrast for planets detected with angular and spectral+angular differential methods. We apply this empirical accuracy to study the characterization capabilities of a high-contrast differential imager. We show that the expected photometric performances will allow the detection and characterization of exoplanets down to a Jupiter mass at angular separations of 1.0 and 0.2 arcsec, respectively, around high-mass and low-mass stars with two observations in different filter pairs. We also show that the determination of the physical parameters of the planets from photometric measurements in different filter pairs is essentially limited by the error on the determination of the surface gravity.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e25a9348835be734adf4f574a176414cd6ef385c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. B. Bowler

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. B. Bowler
  2. T. Birnstiel
  3. C. Dullemond
  4. Th. Henning
  5. Simon Bruderer
  6. C. Mordasini
  7. M. Benisty
  8. Andrea Isella

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. T. Birnstiel
  2. B. Bowler
  3. R. Galicher
  4. S. Udry
  5. Th. Henning
  6. M. Meyer
  7. C. Dullemond
  8. G. Lesur

Citations in the corpus