Three Radial Gaps in the Disk of TW Hydrae Imaged with SPHERE

By R. van Boekel, Th. Henning, J. Menu, J. D. Boer, Maud Langlois, A. Müller, H. Avenhaus, A. Boccaletti, H. Schmid, C. Thalmann and 17 more. 2016

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present scattered light images of the TW Hya disk performed with the Spectro-Polarimetric High-contrast Exoplanet REsearch instrument in Polarimetric Differential Imaging mode at 0.63, 0.79, 1.24, and 1.62 μm. We also present H2/H3-band angular differential imaging (ADI) observations. Three distinct radial depressions in the polarized intensity distribution are seen, around ≈85, ≈21, and ≲6 au. The overall intensity distribution has a high degree of azimuthal symmetry; the disk is somewhat brighter than average toward the south and darker toward the north–west. The ADI observations yielded no signifiant detection of point sources in the disk. Our observations have a linear spatial resolution of 1–2 au, similar to that of recent ALMA dust continuum observations. The sub-micron-sized dust grains that dominate the light scattering in the disk surface are strongly coupled to the gas. We created a radiative transfer disk model with self-consistent temperature and vertical structure iteration and including grain size-dependent dust settling. This method may provide independent constraints on the gas distribution at higher spatial resolution than is feasible with ALMA gas line observations. We find that the gas surface density in the “gaps” is reduced by ≈50% to ≈80% relative to an unperturbed model. Should embedded planets be responsible for carving the gaps then their masses are at most a few 10 . The observed gaps are wider, with shallower flanks, than expected for planet–disk interaction with such low-mass planets. If forming planetary bodies have undergone collapse and are in the “detached phase,” then they may be directly observable with future facilities such as the Mid-Infrared E-ELT Imager and Spectrograph at the E-ELT.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc660f60fa432e45450d72c8360eb6d9d53a1223

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. T. Birnstiel
  2. D. Wilner
  3. S. Andrews
  4. C. Dullemond
  5. Xue-Ning Bai
  6. Matthew R. Bate
  7. Zhaohuan Zhu
  8. A. Hughes

In Instrumentation

  1. S. Andrews
  2. T. Birnstiel
  3. D. Wilner
  4. Xue-Ning Bai
  5. Zhaohuan Zhu
  6. A. Hughes
  7. J. Carpenter
  8. C. Dullemond

Citations in the corpus