Imaging Extrasolar Giant Planets

By B. Bowler. 2016

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

High-contrast adaptive optics (AO) imaging is a powerful technique to probe the architectures of planetary systems from the outside-in and survey the atmospheres of self-luminous giant planets. Direct imaging has rapidly matured over the past decade and especially the last few years with the advent of high-order AO systems, dedicated planet-finding instruments with specialized coronagraphs, and innovative observing and post-processing strategies to suppress speckle noise. This review summarizes recent progress in high-contrast imaging with particular emphasis on observational results, discoveries near and below the deuterium-burning limit, and a practical overview of large-scale surveys and dedicated instruments. I conclude with a statistical meta-analysis of deep imaging surveys in the literature. Based on observations of 384 unique and single young (≈5–300 Myr) stars spanning stellar masses between 0.1 and 3.0 M⊙, the overall occurrence rate of 5–13 MJup companions at orbital distances of 30–300 au is 0.6 − 0.5 + 0.7 % assuming hot-start evolutionary models. The most massive giant planets regularly accessible to direct imaging are about as rare as hot Jupiters are around Sun-like stars. Dividing this sample into individual stellar mass bins does not reveal any statistically significant trend in planet frequency with host mass: giant planets are found around 2.8 − 2.3 + 3.7 % of BA stars, <4.1% of FGK stars, and <3.9% of M dwarfs. Looking forward, extreme AO systems and the next generation of ground- and space-based telescopes with smaller inner working angles and deeper detection limits will increase the pace of discovery to ultimately map the demographics, composition, evolution, and origin of planets spanning a broad range of masses and ages.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Education, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e95a37409b966ebfa503211c338bfd3c42b83439

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. C. Mordasini
  2. Th. Henning
  3. B. Bowler
  4. A. Tokovinin
  5. E. Chiang
  6. Ilaria Pascucci
  7. G. Mulders
  8. Paul Mollière

In Education

  1. C. Mordasini
  2. A. Mann
  3. Ilaria Pascucci
  4. G. Mulders
  5. A. Tokovinin
  6. D. Apai
  7. G. Lodato

In Instrumentation

  1. A. Tokovinin
  2. R. Gratton
  3. C. Mordasini
  4. R. Dong
  5. A. Mann
  6. Th. Henning
  7. V. D’Orazi
  8. C. Moutou

Citations in the corpus