High School Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Levels of Enjoyment of an Environmental Education Unit on Nonnative Plants
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e23947bba92b058eac9f3661a4e68df1fadf7820
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Social Psychology
- P. Prokop
- Jana Fančovičová
- Andrea Tolarovičová
- A. M. Camerik
- V. Peterková
- S. Tunnicliffe
- Franz Xaver Bogner
- Muhammet Usak
Citations in the corpus
- High School Students’ Attitudes Towards Spiders: A cross‐cultural comparison (2010, background): “Therefore, high school students represent the most appropriate age group for environmental education, because they are capable of understanding complex situations in the environment (DiEnno & Hilton, 2005).”
- Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter students' knowledge and attitudes towards plants (2011, background): “For example, DiEnno and Hilton (2005) investigated how application of constructivist learning theory to environmental education influences knowledge gains and attitudes towards non-native plant species among high school pupils.”
- Slovakian Students’ Knowledge of and Attitudes toward Biotechnology (2007, background): “A significant relationship between knowledge and attitudes has been found in several studies (DiEnno & Hilton, 2005 ; Tikka, Kuitunen, & Tynys, 2000 ; Weaver, 2002 ).”
- "Disgusting" Animals: Primary School Children's Attitudes and Myths of Bats and Spiders (2008, background): “DiEnno and Hilton (2005) compared two teaching methods (constructivistic vs. traditional approach) on high school students‟ attitudes and knowledge of non-native plants and found that knowledge and attitudes of students experiencing a constructivistic approach significantly increased, while no…”