Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions about Emergent Technologies

By James N. Druckman, T. Bolsen. 2011

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2384b1d24d7c746feb0041c9143245dbbcc993a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Psychological Reactance From Reading Basic Facts on Climate Change: The Role of Prior Views and Political Identification (2018, result): “These findings conform to the notion that one’s prior views, instead of the presented scientific facts, often shape beliefs about science (Druckman & Bolsen, 2011; Krosnick, Holbrook, Lowe, & Visser, 2006).”
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection (2013, background): “…that cause such meanings to take hold, and on framing and other strategies for cleaning up that environment once it has been contaminated with polarizing meanings (Kahan, 2012b), is already well underway (Corner, Whitmarsh & Xenias, 2012; Druckman & Bolsen, 2012, 2011, Nisbet & Scheufele, 2009).”
Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects (2012, methodology): “We also used a fairly short survey to ensure a representative sample beyond just those who have the time and interest to complete a lengthy survey.”
Applying the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model to Examine Support for Climate Change Mitigation Policy (2014, background): “…reasoning as leading individuals with strongly held beliefs to be “prone to overly accommodate supportive evidence while dismissing out-of-hand evidence that challenges their prior attitudes” (pp. 755-756; see also Ditto, Scepansky, Munro, Apanovitch, & Lockhart, 1998; Druckman & Bolsen, 2011).”
Believing and sharing misinformation, fact-checks, and accurate information on social media: The role of anxiety during COVID-19 (2021, background): “topics, including risks to public health (see, for example, Achen and Bartels, 2017; Cacciatore et al., 2013; Chinn and Pasek, 2020; Druckman and Bolsen, 2011; Kraft et al., 2015; Yeo et al., 2014).”
The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning Is and How to Measure It (2016, methodology): ““Cultural worldviews” are used in studies (Bolsen, Druckman, & Cook, 2015; Druckman & Bolsen, 2011) that investigate “cultural cognition,” a construct developed to explore societal-risk conflicts (Kahan, 2015).”
The Impact of Climate Change–Related Imagery and Text on Public Opinion and Behavior Change (2016, background): “As literature on motivated reasoning (Druckman & Bolsen, 2011; Kunda, 1990) suggests that individuals with different political orientations may interpret the same information in different ways, especially for polarizing issues like climate change (Hart & Nisbet, 2012), we also investigate the…”
Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital Age (2016, background): “There remains work to be done to integrate findings from these studies into empirical research concerned with the effects of media use at the individual level (see Druckman & Bolsen, 2011; Himelboim, McCreery, & Smith, 2013; Messing & West-wood, 2012).”
Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation (2014, neutral): “…war (Bartels, 2002; Gaines, Kuklinski, Quirk, Peyton, & Verkuilen, 2007; Lavine et al., 2012), prior attitudes color the evaluations of arguments (Druckman & Bolsen, 2011; Druckman et al., 2013; Taber & Lodge, 2006) and subsequent search for information (Druckman, Fein, & Leeper, 2012), and…”
Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments (2016, background): “…March 2016 19:51 Although this research clarifies frame–issue connections that have greater and lesser effects on preferences (e.g., Aarøe 2011, Arceneaux 2012, Baumgartner et al. 2006, Druckman & Bolsen 2011), the literature is far from identifying what exactly makes a value frame strong or weak.”