Mindreading: Judgments About Intentionality and Motives in Dispositional Inference

By G. Reeder. 2009

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e20042bc6ee7eb16453fe28c23d92ba4b0b59994

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Braggart's Dilemma: On the Social Rewards and Penalties of Advertising Prosocial Behavior (2015, background): “The judgment of another person’s good deeds depends on the intentions that an observer believes underlie a given behavior (Reeder 2009).”
Receiver responses to rewarded referrals: the motive inferences framework (2013, methodology): “The Multiple Inference Model (MIM; Reeder 2009a; Reeder et al. 2002) provides a theoretical framework that can help us understand how consumers sort through the alternative motives.”
Cheapened altruism: Discounting personally affected prosocial actors (2012, unknown): “Prior research suggests that people infer dispositional traits from motive inferences (Reeder, 2009; Reeder, Kumar, HessonMcInnis, & Trafimow, 2002).”
Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty (2014, background): “To manage and coordinate interpersonal relationships, individuals assess themoral character of those around them (e.g. Reeder, 2009).”
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality (2012, background): “Modern theories of dispositional inference also suggest that the inference of people’s beliefs and motives underlies trait attributions to these people (Malle, 2006, 2011; Reeder, 2009).”
Suspending judgment to create value: Suspicion and trust in negotiation (2010, background): “Motive attributions affect person perception (Reeder, 2009; Reeder et al., 2004) and attitude (Ames et al., 2004; Struthers et al., 2008).”
A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect (2013, background): “Though the question has rarely been explored empirically, direct and indirect evidence indicates that attitudes are, in fact, more informative than personality traits: Individuals are better able to evaluate others when the other is described in terms of the attitudes they hold versus the personalit”
Better Not Smile at the Price: The Differential Role of Brand Anthropomorphization on Perceived Price Fairness (2015, background): “Thus, intentional actions are interpreted as a target’s motives for performing these actions because inferring motive gives meaning to an action and shapes further impressions of a target (Reeder 2009).”