What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway
By B. Økland, A. Bakke, Sigmund Hågvar, T. Kvamme. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2004
274 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0de088b6092b6b164efdf7af3ca04bc997e1d37
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management (2009, background): “…supply, either via establishment of non-intervention reserves, or, in commercially managed stands, via such management modifications as prolonging harvest cycle or retaining harvest remnants in the woods (e.g., Hodge and Peterken 1998; Martikainen et al. 2000; Chandler 1991; Økland et al. 1996).”
- Arthropod biodiversity after forest fires: winners and losers in the winter fire regime of the southern Alps (2004, background): “According to Okland (1996) and Martikainen et al. (2000) they are suitable for comparing different forest environments and their ecological conditions over wide areas.”
- Body size affects the spatial scale of habitat–beetle interactions (2005, background): “Økland et al. (1996) found that the abundance and richness of flying saproxylic beetles was more strongly related to the amount of decaying wood resources at larger than smaller scales, and that 40 /40 m represented much too small a scale to reveal this relationship.”
- Hollow oaks and beetle conservation: the significance of the surroundings (2010, background): “The importance of dead wood in the surroundings has proven influential in other studies of saproxylic beetles (Økland et al. 1996; Franc et al. 2007).”
- Learning from a benign neglect strategy in a national park: Response of saproxylic beetles to dead wood accumulation (2010, background): “1-ha plots, which are sufficiently large to avoid unrealistic high estimates but small enough to capture small-scale variation (Müller et al., 2008b; Økland et al., 1996).”
- Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests (2006, background): “Relationships with woody debris are believed to be strongly scale-dependent (Økland et al., 1996), so we sampled fallen CWD at two spatial scales.”
- Factors and scales potentially important for saproxylic beetles in temperate mixed oak forest (2007, methodology): “A common definition of coarse dead wood (P10 cm in diameter) is used instead of the P40 cm definition that was indicated to be important for saproxylic beetles in Norway (Økland et al., 1996) as dead oak P40 cm was very rare in the stands.”
- Conceptual problems of Ecological Continuity and its bioindicators (2001, background): “That many saproxylic species have a high mobility in the landscape was shown by Økland et al. (1996) who studied the species richness of saproxylic beetles at four different spatial scales (0.16, 1 ha, 1 and 4 km2).”
- Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories (2003, methodology): “However, this effect may be difficult to demonstrate in many cases, especially if all species are included and the scale is not fine enough (i.e. a few metres) (cf. Siitonen 1994; Økland 1996; Økland et al. 1996).”
- Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia (2002, background): “A diverse polypore fl ora is likely to indicate an array of dead-wood habitats and numerous fauna of other organisms living in dead trees (Økland et al. 1996).”