Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs

By G. Kennedy. 2008

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0a06b9f811cbee50fb72054868ed9f2475b4e96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. Jörg Romeis
2. M. Meissle
3. S. Naranjo
4. Yunhe Li
5. Franz Bigler
6. A. Shelton
7. S. Kouser
8. D. Shapiro-Ilan

In Plant Science

1. Jörg Romeis
2. S. Naranjo
3. M. Meissle
4. Yunhe Li
5. Franz Bigler
6. A. Shelton
7. S. Kouser
8. L. Lacey

Citations in the corpus

• Non‐target risk assessment of Bt crops – Cry protein uptake by aphids (2011, background): “Those natural enemies can help to prevent herbivores that are not controlled by the GE trait from reaching pest status and thus to ensure the sustainable use of the GE variety as part of an integrated pest management system (Kennedy 2008; Romeis et al. 2008b).”
• Bt maize expressing Cry3Bb1 does not harm the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, or its ladybird beetle predator, Stethorus punctillum (2010, background): “A reduction in natural enemies would detract from the benefits provided by a GE variety within an integrated pest management context (Kennedy, 2008; Romeis et al., 2008a).”
• Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: A panel data analysis (2011, background): “In any case, IPM and Bt technology are highly complementary approaches (Romeis et al., 2008), so that pursuing one should not be seen as a substitute for the other.”
• Pests, pesticide use and alternative options in European maize production: current status and future prospects (2009, background): “While those hybrids are commercialized in the USA since 2003 (Hellmich et al. 2008), they are in the authorization process in the EU.”
• Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future. (2015, background): “nities for incorporating BV into GM cropping systems to cope with secondary non target pests, or as part of an insect resistance management strategy (Thakore, 2006; Kennedy, 2008).”
• Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “…starts with laboratory studies representing highly controlled, worst-case exposure conditions and progresses to bioassays with more realistic exposure to the toxin and semi-field or open field studies carried out under less controlled conditions (Garcia-Alonso et al., 2006; Romeis et al., 2008a).”
• Current control methods for diamondback moth and other brassica insect pests and the prospects for improved management with lepidopteran-resistant Bt vegetable brassicas in Asia and Africa (2010, neutral): “incorporated into IPM programmes (Romeis et al., 2008).”
• Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns (2009, background): “The prevailing perspective is that Bt crops represent host plant resistance [33] and as such provide a foundation for suppressing key pests with little additional management input.”
• The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops (2009, background): “These Bt genes control the European corn borer, the corn rootworm, and different stemborers (Romeis et al. 2008).”
• The New Integrated Pest Management Paradigm for the Modern Age (2019, neutral): “A strategy that involves the use of pest-resistant and pest-tolerant cultivars developed through traditional breeding or genetic engineering (Douglas 2018, Kennedy 2008, Nelson et al. 2018).”